Co-designing digital health for older adults: a practical guide to effective engagement
Evidence-based science journalism. Every claim verified against peer-reviewed research.
designingdigitalhealtholderadultsresearch
Evidence-based science journalism. Every claim verified against peer-reviewed research.
Digital health tools frequently fall short for older adults. Barriers such as limited digital literacy, accessibility issues, and interfaces not designed for age-related cognitive or sensory changes often hinder effective use (Wilson et al., 2021). This creates a significant gap, leaving a crucial demographic underserved by innovations meant to improve health.
While co-design—involving older adults directly in the development process—offers a powerful solution, its full potential is often hampered. A systematic review by Cole et al. (2022) highlighted that while older adults are engaged in co-design of electronic healthcare tools, significant reporting gaps limit the reproducibility and scalability of successful approaches. This inconsistency makes it difficult to generalize findings, apply effective strategies universally, or build upon previous work. Without clear, comprehensive documentation, the field struggles to learn and improve.
Many digital health initiatives describe their design processes without clearly linking them to user outcomes, leading to tools that may not truly address user needs. This disconnect between design intent and practical application underscores the critical need for ongoing evaluation, adaptation, and, most importantly, transparent reporting of co-design efforts.
To truly empower older adults, digital health tools must evolve beyond mere functionality. They require an iterative, user-centered approach that incorporates feedback throughout development, fostering a sense of ownership and engagement. Addressing the barriers faced by older adults in digital health demands a multifaceted strategy, prioritizing robust co-design and ensuring comprehensive, reproducible reporting.
Co-design offers a powerful mechanism to bridge the digital divide for older adults by directly involving them in the development of digital health tools. This approach ensures solutions are not only usable but also genuinely useful, addressing the unique cognitive and sensory needs that often go overlooked.
Three Pillars of Inclusive Co-Design:
Anchoring Language: Another crucial technique is using 'Anchoring Language.' Facilitators avoid jargon and relate digital concepts to physical-world analogies. For example, describing a 'menu' as a 'list of choices at a restaurant' or a 'folder' as a 'filing cabinet' helps ground abstract digital concepts in familiar experiences, making them more accessible.
Literacy Checks: Incorporating 'literacy checks' ensures that instructions and materials are understood. This might involve asking participants to rephrase instructions in their own words or using visual aids to confirm comprehension, fostering an environment where all voices can contribute meaningfully.
By integrating these layers, co-design becomes more than a token gesture it becomes a critical mechanism that taps into lived experiences, ensuring digital tools align with users' needs and capabilities. This iterative feedback loop allows for continuous refinement, enhancing usability and fostering a sense of ownership among older adults, which is crucial for long-term engagement and adherence to digital health interventions.
To ensure your co-design sessions with older adults are effective, inclusive, and contribute to reproducible outcomes, follow these actionable steps:
Identify the key features or aspects of the tool you want to co-design in this session.
Set realistic expectations for what can be achieved, focusing on specific feedback points rather than broad concepts.
Conduct a Pre-Session Tech Check (Darley et al., 2022) with each participant a day or two before the session. Confirm their access to the necessary technology (internet, video conferencing software, microphone, camera) and troubleshoot any issues. This significantly reduces pre-session anxiety.
Plan and communicate fair compensation for participants' time and expertise. This is crucial for equitable recruitment and demonstrates respect for their contribution.
Send clear, simple instructions in advance, including a reminder of the session's purpose and what to expect.
Use Anchoring Language (Darley et al., 2022) to explain digital concepts, relating them to physical-world analogies. Avoid jargon.
Employ visual aids and demonstrations. Show, don't just tell.
Actively encourage participation from all individuals. Use open-ended questions and allow ample time for responses. Be patient and listen attentively.
Incorporate 'literacy checks' by asking participants to rephrase instructions or concepts to ensure understanding.
Document not just what was said, but also how participants interacted with the tool, their body language, and any points of confusion or delight.
Essential Elements for a Reproducible Co-Design Report:
Participant Demographics: Age range, digital literacy levels, relevant health conditions, prior experience with similar tools.
Session Context: Date, duration, location (physical/virtual), number of participants, facilitator details.
Co-Design Activities: Detailed description of tasks, prompts, and materials used.
Key Findings & Insights: Specific feedback, identified pain points, suggested improvements, and unexpected observations.
Methodological Adaptations: Any changes made to the session plan due to participant needs or technical issues.
Outcomes & Next Steps: How the feedback will inform design iterations, and plans for future co-design sessions.
Challenges & Limitations: Acknowledgment of any difficulties encountered during the session or limitations of the findings.
Translate findings into actionable design changes for your digital tool.
Communicate back to participants (if feasible) how their input has influenced the design. This fosters trust and encourages continued engagement in future iterations.
* Plan for subsequent co-design sessions to test revised prototypes, ensuring continuous refinement based on user feedback.
By moving beyond tokenistic inclusion and adopting a systematic, well-documented co-design process, developers can create digital health tools that are not only usable but truly empowering for older adults. This commitment to rigorous methodology and transparent reporting is the key to closing the digital divide and advancing the entire field.
Health care technology trends 2025: AI benefits, wearable use cases and telehealth expansion
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: opportunities and challenges | Navid Toosi Saidy | TEDxQUT
Why do our bodies age? - Monica Menesini
The Formula for Successful Aging | Gary Small | TEDxUCLA
A brief introduction to co-design
Can co-design promote equity in global health? | Rachel Hall-Clifford | TEDxEmory
Systematic Literature Review and Meta Analysis
Can you feel the slight tremor in your own hand as you scroll on your phone? The tiny hesitation before tapping a new app? Now, imagine that tremor amplified, that hesitation stretched into a wall of confusion. The article reveals that digital tools often fail not because of malice, but because of a profound design empathy gap—a failure to truly feel the world through older senses. The science shows that co-design, when done with genuine, embodied inclusion, can bridge that gap. *The most powerful technology is not built for a user, but woven with them.*
Science: This simulates common age-related sensory changes (vision, dexterity) that the article identifies as major barriers to digital tool adoption.
You will viscerally understand one of the core accessibility gaps that co-design must address, transforming abstract 'usability' into felt experience.
This nonprofit embodies the article's call for human-centered, accessible digital support by directly connecting volunteers to provide real-time, personalized assistance that bypasses poorly designed interfaces.
While focused on conservation, Rare's core methodology of community-led, behaviorally-informed co-design mirrors the article's prescription for engaging older adults—centering local knowledge and lived experience to create sustainable solutions.
A viewer would see a close-up of an older adult's hands, slightly unsteady, holding a tablet. A younger designer's hand gently rests beside it, not taking over, but pointing to a large, simple button on the screen. The older adult's finger taps it successfully, and their face breaks into a relieved, proud smile.
Witnessing the moment of dignified mastery—not pity or help, but partnership—makes the abstract principle of 'inclusive design' feel like a shared human victory.
More from Human Health
The circadian clock is a fundamental biological system that orchestrates nearly all physiological processes within a roughly 24-hour cycle, anticipating...
Unforgiveness is a prolonged, unresolved emotional state characterized by resentment, bitterness, and hostility, which initiates a cascade of physiologi...
The circadian clock is an intrinsic biological system that regulates nearly all physiological processes over approximately a 24-hour cycle, orchestratin...